- From: Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 03:27:38 +0000
- To: Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Sounds reasonable that all TouchLists are references to individual touches. Thanks Tran -----Original Message----- From: public-webevents-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webevents-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sangwhan Moon Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:17 AM To: public-webevents@w3.org Subject: Input on ISSUE-16 For those who have reviewed the proposal for ISSUE-18, you probably would have noticed that there are no examples which assert between two Touch objects between different lists. We haven't reached a conclusion on ISSUE-16, which is the main reason why I've specifically avoided cases that have any assumptions on that for now, but after doing the example code my take on the issue is that all TouchLists should be thin - being collections of references pointing to individual touches. Bottom line - I think all of the asserts mentioned in ISSUE-16 should pass. I'm not sure what we have out in the wild at the moment, I'll spend some time investigating that and provide further input, since the first release of the spec focuses more on "what is available" rather than "what is ideal". Best regards, -- Sangwhan Moon Opera Software ASA | Skype: innodb1
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 03:28:08 UTC