W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > July to September 2011

RE: Input on ISSUE-16

From: Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 03:27:38 +0000
To: Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>, "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Message-ID: <84BCA539DD96614691177EDA3CE4FF0513735A5B@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Sounds reasonable that all TouchLists are references to individual touches.


-----Original Message-----
From: public-webevents-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webevents-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sangwhan Moon
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:17 AM
To: public-webevents@w3.org
Subject: Input on ISSUE-16

For those who have reviewed the proposal for ISSUE-18, you probably
would have noticed that there are no examples which assert between two
Touch objects between different lists.

We haven't reached a conclusion on ISSUE-16, which is the main reason
why I've specifically avoided cases that have any assumptions on that
for now, but after doing the example code my take on the issue is that
all TouchLists should be thin - being collections of references pointing
to individual touches.

Bottom line - I think all of the asserts mentioned in ISSUE-16 should pass.

I'm not sure what we have out in the wild at the moment, I'll spend
some time investigating that and provide further input, since the first
release of the spec focuses more on "what is available" rather than
"what is ideal".

Best regards,

Sangwhan Moon
Opera Software ASA | Skype: innodb1
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 03:28:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:53 UTC