- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:54:53 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Hi, Art- Arthur Barstow wrote (on 4/6/11 7:31 AM): > > As we continue to flesh out the Touch Events spec [TE], I think we > should we consider the following document by Dom and Marcos: I'm a fan of this approach. If this could implemented as part of ReSpec.js, that might make it even easier. Regards- -Doug > [[ > A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Requirements > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-test-methodology-20100128/ > > In this document we present a method for writing, marking-up, and > analyzing conformance requirements in technical specifications. > > We argue that the method yields specifications whose conformance > requirements are testable: that is, upon applying the method, parts of > what is written in the specification can be converted into a test suite > without requiring, for instance, the use of a formal language. > > The method was derived from a collaboration between the W3C's Mobile Web > Initiative: Test Suites Working Group and the Web Applications Working > Group. This collaboration aimed to improve the written quality and > testability of various specifications. The applications, limitations, as > well as possible directions for future work that could refine this > method are described in this document. > ]] > > I'm sure if we had any questions for Dom and Marcos, they would be happy > answer them. > > -AB > > [TE] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/tip/touchevents.html >
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 14:54:56 UTC