- From: Åke Järvklo <ake@jarvklo.se>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:00:54 +0100
- To: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Cc: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>, W3C WebEd Public <public-webed@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD5mPocYWBawqD8pkCm8JegGuxaEHhe8opdWv-4kTysx-W09Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Hmm... IMHO The "keeping current"-problem will over time probably not only apply to external examples and links - it will most likely become equally relevant for our own excersises, our original content (and our translations) sooner or later... So - perhaps having procedures in place for (very visibly) assuring visitors that *we* keep our material current would also be a good thing... Imagine a "quality assurance stamp" on all published material stating "reviewed and updated at {date}" - or "this is a translation, the original text was revised {date} and the translation was updated to reflect that at {date}" .... or something similar (eg. "this is the translation of version 17 of the FED-100 excersise 7.1.2 Assignment 1: Class Homepage") With that in place - wouldn't revising external examples while we regurarily revise the material itself anyway be greatly simplified as well? .... just a thought :) /Åke J 2012/3/3 Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> > *Any* thoughts? > > When I interact with professors they (nearly) always ask about how to stay > current. Many don't know what resources to visit for current trends and to > see how things are evolving. I suspect we all know how radically different > many web dev aspects can be in any 6 month window. > > You may have considered this in your "reading lists" bullet, but I am wary > of the can of worms recommending specific blogs/sites can open. I, for one, > rail against any reference to W3 Schools. While I used to recommend > evolt.org, I think we all know its time has passed. > > Is it too early to identify a set of parameters for suggesting ongoing, > day-to-day online resources? > > > > Sent from my tablet and probably full of typos as a result. > > > On Mar 2, 2012, at 1:04 PM, "Chris Mills" <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > > > Some thoughts I have put together over the course of today, detailing > how our learning material might fit in with educators and students involved > in web ed courses, and next things I am going to do. > > > > > http://www.w3.org/community/webed/wiki/Positioning_document_for_web_ed_learning_material > > > > any thoughts appreciated > > > > Chris Mills > > Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com editor, Opera Software > > Co-chair, web education community group, W3C > > > > * Try Opera: http://www.opera.com > > * Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: > http://dev.opera.com > > * Contribute to web education: http://www.w3.org/community/webed/ > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 01:56:32 UTC