- From: Janet Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:55:01 -0800
- To: Lewis Nyman <lewismoo@gmail.com>
- CC: Mark DuBois <Mark@webprofessionals.org>, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>, public-webed@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F0E2155.4090301@mozilla.com>
A multiple-choice test doesn't have to be based on rote memorization, and can test understanding. For example, you could use a problem-based approach where all the relevant elements, attributes, and properties are given, but examinee has to pick the combination of them that best represents a certain principle. But this is what I meant by doing it "really right" is hard. --Janet On 1/10/12 9:46 AM, Lewis Nyman wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does anyone else feel that a memory based 'quiz' is unrealistic? I'd > be surprised if there are any front end web professionals that don't > look something up or copy + paste on a daily basis. > > If we want to train people for real life than either we have the quiz > 'open book' or make it project based. We need to test understanding > not memory. > > -- > Lewis Nyman > > On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 15:42, Mark DuBois wrote: > >> Hi everyone: >> >> We have been taking the approach mentioned at the URL below for several >> years for our Web Professional certifications. Specifically, there is a >> "quiz" part and a "practicum" part. It took meetings with many >> business and >> industry participants over the course of several years to get the >> necessary >> domains and subdomains right. It is a significant amount of work. >> >> Best, >> Mark DuBois (Mark@webprofessionals.org >> <mailto:Mark@webprofessionals.org>) >> Director of Education, World Organization of Webmasters >> http://www.webprofessionals.org >> Twitter: @Mark_DuBois >> >> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are >> intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom this >> message >> is addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is >> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the >> sender >> by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. In an >> effort >> to maintain compliance with the Copyright Act: Please Do Not Forward This >> Message Without Permission. >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Mills [mailto:cmills@opera.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:56 AM >> To: public-webed@w3.org <mailto:public-webed@w3.org> >> Subject: Fronteers certification - opinions? >> >> Fronteers, the dutch web developer community, are making serious >> progress on >> creating a certification - see http://wnas.nl/fronteers-certification for >> more details. >> >> Wilf has asked for some opinions on this - does anyone have any. And >> if so, >> can they share them here, or on twitter with the #frontcert hashtag? >> >> thanks! >> >> Chris Mills >> Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com <http://dev.opera.com> >> editor, Opera Software Co-chair, >> web education community group, W3C >> >> * Try Opera: http://www.opera.com >> * Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: >> http://dev.opera.com <http://dev..opera.com> >> * Contribute to web education: http://www.w3.org/community/webed/ >
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 23:58:11 UTC