- From: Osman Yüksel <yuxel@sonsuzdongu.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:11:12 +0200
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Cc: prisca <prisca@eyedea.eu>, public-webed@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALbeZG4xO-jbqAvZxh+T0T_g7J5UsG2eM6EqWBmWOObWJYrkQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Should we also aim kids? Github organizes such thing : https://github.com/blog/1034-kids-are-the-future-teach-em-to-code May be we can prepare such things for kids Or we can poke someone from Github and they may prepare those things for WebEd community? 2012/2/6 Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> > Thanks Prisca! We weill definitely explore what to do for > teaching/beginners. Getting some feedback from your colleagues would also > be much appreciated, if you can find the time. > > Chris Mills > Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com editor, Opera Software > Co-chair, web education community group, W3C > > * Try Opera: http://www.opera.com > * Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: > http://dev.opera.com > * Contribute to web education: http://www.w3.org/community/webed/ > > On 5 Feb 2012, at 15:09, prisca wrote: > > Chris ;) > > thanks for geting back to me about my points :) > (and no need to say sorry - you weren't grumpy :) :) :) ) > > About doing work ~ yes, please, do feel free to hand me a task and let me > get onto it when I can - that sounds good to me ;) > > About the tutorials and the learning materials generally... > glad to see that Anna agrees with some of my points here. I think it is > the nature of the presentation on the site - the lengthy text without > sufficient visuals which makes this less suitable for teachers who are new > to the web subject and students of entry levels. > > The idea of slideshows sounds good - or even just more illustrated > examples. > Rachel Andrew just published a post on the topic of writing tutorials for > beginners, very good points: > http://www.rachelandrew.co.uk/archives/2012/02/05/writing-beginner-level-tutorials/ > > About getting feedback: yeah, I know - this one is hard.... especially > considering the ever growing paperwork teacher have to deal with... so I > don't have any solid answers here, but I feel very strongly that this > resource we're building will only be useful if tested and edited to suit... > I will ask my colleagues about this when I can catch them next time. Maybe > they might have some suggestions for us which we havent' thought of... will > let you know ... > > About my suggestion of a forum: that might of course just be me.... was > just an idea ;) > For getting feedback on specific resources etc... I do think it would make > sense. > > Will get back to your survey in a minute as well :) > > Stay warm and enjoy the snow :) > Prisca > > ___________________________________________________ > Prisca Schmarsow ✪ 07969 713 329 > graphiceyedea.co.uk *•* eyelearn.org *•* webeyedea.info > student forum: > eyelearn.org/forum > ___________________________________________________ > > > > > On 30 January 2012 16:39, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 27 Jan 2012, at 14:40, prisca wrote: >> >> Hey Chris :) >> >> echoing others - all I can do is apologise sorry for not replying >> sooner.... especially after I mentioned my struggles to you with trying to >> get involved here.... >> sorry about that... >> >> >> No worries at all - I'm sorry if I came across as being a bit grumpy last >> week. >> >> >> all this does though is highlight the problem that I have - and many >> others who are teaching might have the same issues. With the overload of >> bureaucracy demanded for documenting learner's progress etc now growing >> more and more each year it seems - this does take time away from everything >> else. >> >> >> I am certainly hearing this from a lot of other educators too - so much >> more paperwork to deal with, leading to less time for actual personal >> development and projects like this. >> >> >> I'm delivering teaching for web - and I would love to contribute - but >> keeping up with the messages via this email group with lots of useful >> suggestions and comments I found hard and almost impossible, simply due to >> the sheer amount of emails. I tried to read them all - couldn't find the >> time, I tried to comment on some of the thoughts brought forward and some >> of the ideas I had - again, lack of time and keeping track of the comments >> meant I didn't do that either. >> >> >> Ok, so perhaps it would work better if I just handed you a task here and >> there, or asked for feedback on something when needed, and you can dig in >> if you have time, rather than me expecting you to keep up with the whole >> list? >> >> >> I love where this is going and can see how brilliant this could be - >> however - I am getting worried about how suitable some of these materials >> would be for teaching, especially for entry level students. I can only go >> by colleagues of mine who are delivering A-Levels, GCSEs and level 1/2 >> courses - and who are now all asked to deliver web related units. >> I always have to think of Anna Debenham and what she highlighted in her >> talks, silly units, odd requirements etc... >> >> Looking at the bits that I managed to keep up with on here - I couldn't >> see anything that I could forward to them to help them out. All seemed much >> more related to proper web design/development teaching - all a bit too >> advanced , perhaps too technically worded for my colleagues to be able to >> use easily. I'm sure those resources will be brilliant for courses which >> aim to train up the new cohort of webdesigners/developers - so that's all >> good. >> >> However, how about the entry level - the practical approach to teaching >> people only the very basics - to get nice project brief written to apply >> those skills, to have teaching material that could be used in the class >> room - for both adults and younger age groups? >> All I know is that a lot of teaching is really out of date - and that >> starts with the entry level or more introductory teaching, not only the >> full on web related courses only. >> >> >> Please don't get me wrong - for example, the Web Standards Curriculum<http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/1-introduction-to-the-web-standards-cur/>is truly fantastic - very useful and a brilliant resource for all, >> accessible easily etc etc.... I have tried to use it in class - and my >> students are adults, aiming to work as webdesigners. So I thought it will >> be perfect - the right target group for this sort of content, writing style >> and level. >> But my individual lessons with more visual documentation (often not >> always) and a more custom presentation, like coloured arrows, highlighted >> text and plenty of screenshots are the ones my students tend to take to >> much easier than the brilliant articles on the Web Standards Curriculum ... >> to my surprise. >> (an example, just to show you what I mean, here's a tutorial on FireFTP I >> wrote 5 years ago by now...: >> http://graphiceyedea.co.uk/11/upload-via-ftp-in-firefox-fireftp - very >> popular with students who seem to refer back to outside of class and cope >> just fine with solving issues themselves) >> >> Considering my colleagues and their students who need to do web only as a >> small part of their courses - all this is even more of an issue.... >> >> >> So basically what you are saying is that the tutorials as they stand are >> not immediately useful for actual teaching. I talked to Anna Debenham about >> this earlier today actually, and she said very similar things. >> >> So maybe we should treat the tutorials as learning material for people >> whom that approach suits, and background learning for teachers to read >> before the class, and for advanced students but then create a set of >> bridging materials for actually teaching the classes with? >> >> These could take the form of slideshows that teach the syntax and basic >> concepts in a very visual and non-wordy way, coupled with exercises to give >> the students to do, to actually learn the stuff in practice. (And their >> solutions of course). This would probably fit in well with the curriculum >> structures. >> >> Would this be a better approach? >> >> I could try to create a prototype to show you all. >> >> >> >> Now, I'm not saying I have any answers here — these are just a few >> thoughts which I meant to commment on much sooner.... >> >> Basically, I'm worried there's lots of time spent creating, collating and >> producing resources which might be wrong for teaching in the classroom and >> be more of a reference for more advanced students, rather than a practical >> solution right now. >> I think we need people who need to teach web to test these as we go along >> - get feedback during the process and amend/edit to suit. >> >> >> Yes, we absolutely need to get it right asap, as we have such limited >> resources to do this. >> >> >> >> I thought that maybe a forum might be a better way for us all to move >> things forward? Possibly organised into categories by level, filter option >> by tag for topics? >> I feel I would be able to manage that better ~ for example, if I write up >> something for my students anyway - say about typography<http://graphiceyedea.co.uk/11/typography-for-the-web/>- I could then just add this to the right category on the forum, get >> feedback - or share it is as resource. >> >> >> I am not sure - I think this might be more of a personal preference >> thing. I personally find forums a lot more fiddly to handle than e-mail >> lists. Has anyone else got any strong feelings on this? >> >> Maybe we could organise a hybrid approach? Perhaps use e-mail, but then >> add tags into the subject line if the thread concerns one particular >> subject, or is or particular relevance to one or two people? >> >> >> As for getting my colleagues some support in their teaching - they might >> not have time or motivation to be involved directly themselves - but a >> forum might offer the right platform for them to find useful resources to >> use immediately, try out and give feedback directly. I imagine lots of good >> input on wording and illustrative examples. >> >> >> Ok, I can see how a public forum might be useful for getting wider >> feedback from a group of occasional contributors, for example if we want to >> solicit feedback. >> >> I'll mull this over! >> >> thanks so much for your feedback, >> >> Chris >> > > > -- Osman Yüksel http://www.yuxel.net http://www.sonsuzdongu.com
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 06:11:42 UTC