- From: Richard D. Worth <rdworth@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:50:15 -0500
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, public-webed@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMi93MX6KecXLceUEPn2cQkx0yhp7-ZRSoRbAM0Z_T+GOD9wxg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > > > On 30 Nov 2011, at 13:35, Richard D. Worth wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: > >> >> Le 30 nov. 2011 à 07:36, Chris Mills a écrit : >> > shall we go with by-sa. or just by? I think by-sa is best, as I worry >> what would happen to our material if we didn't include SA. We want the >> material and any evolution of it to be open, surely? >> >> >> We have a very similar case here. We want the content to be widespread by >> people and reused be it in a commercial context and/or an open context. As >> long as the source stays open, people have always the possibility to use >> it. It's why I'm in favor of CC-BY >> > > If we were authoring all the content ourselves, I think I could be in > complete agreement, as CC-BY is most analogous to a permissive code > license, such as MIT or BSD, which have shown to permit sufficient adoption > and use (surely due in large part to their simplicity) amongst all the most > popular JavaScript libraries for example (the software I'm most familiar > with writing and licensing). > > However, deciding to license our content CC-BY would preclude us from > using any content from MDN, as just one example. Is that worth it? I'm not > sure it is. > > > This is not necessarily the case - a licensor can waive certain license > conditions if they see fit. And we are intending to talk to the different > content holders about using their content on the site, rather than just > using it and not telling them. This needed for etiquette and goodwill to be > maintained. > Great! > > Of course, we could perhaps go with CC-BY-SA but then state clearly in the > license material that if you want to use our material in a commercial > project of some kind but don't want to put it under the same license, then > contact us and we will review your particular case - if we approve then we > will waive the -SA- condition? > We'd only be in a position to grant such a waiver if we had lined up waivers from the above content holders. If we go through that effort, I'd be just as happy having our license be CC-By from the start, but if there were an overwhelming majority that wanted CC-By-SA as the default and CC-By as an exception, I agree, this is a good way forward. - Richard
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 15:50:49 UTC