Re: CfCs closing tomorrow - next steps

Harry, Ryan,
Indeed we still have the cfc for key format to be normative or not (to describe it short) to trigger.
Regards,
Virginie
>From my mobile


---- Ryan Sleevi a écrit ----

Harry,

You suggested there is a plurality of call for comments, but there appears to only be one - regarding Secure Origins.

Could you indicate what you believe the other outstanding CFCs are?

I'm specifically looking at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2016Aug/0047.html - a clear CfC - and https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2016Aug/0046.html  - which suggested a CFC would be proposed at a later date.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org<mailto:hhalpin@w3.org>> wrote:
Note that unless there objections, all CfCs put out by the chair will
close tomorrow.

We will then focus the next call (Sept 12th) on final next steps for a
PR re fixing formal objections and preparing the transition call (i.e.
double-checking the test-suite and any final editorial issues), and
hopefully we can then do a PR request by end of the month before our
charter expires.

Great work everyone!

   cheers,

       harry




________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.