RE: WebCrypto edits on key material (Option 2)

Ryan,
When you say “we don’t have interoperable implementations”.
Does this apply still if we remove the key material format as offered by option 2, as announced [1]?
Regards,
Virginie
[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2015Dec/0031.html



From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi@google.com]
Sent: dimanche 17 janvier 2016 10:05
To: Harry Halpin
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
Subject: Re: WebCrypto edits on key material (Option 2)



On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org<mailto:hhalpin@w3.org>> wrote:
Our charter expires end of March, so we *really* need to get to PR,
otherwise the W3C AC will be unhappy. Note some AC members have already
complained, so I doubt we'll get an extension except in 'maintenance mode'.

Harry, we have no interoperable implementations. I don't see how we can, in good faith, advance to PR.


@Ryan/@MarkW - can you do the edits by end of Jan?

  yours,
    harry

P.S.:  If not,  I can ask someone else to do them or do them myself, and
then the WG can check the edits.

________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.