- From: Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:32:12 -0700
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>
- Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFswn4mVq-ZS9to4EsMEg7KDsT9EgoTaFmCqZMwnLs=0_u+UXg@mail.gmail.com>
The meeting notes say that there are no implementations of RSA-PSS: > No implementations: RSA-PSS, AES-CMAC, AES-CFB, CONCAT Note that is not correct -- at least the Chrome browser implements RSA-PSS On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:20 AM, GALINDO Virginie < Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > Following our last meeting call, we decided to remove from the normative > part of our specification the following algorithms for not being > implemented in at least 2 of the platform tested : RSA-PSS, AES-CMAC, > AES-CFB, CONCAT, DH. Detailed discussion can be found under > http://www.w3.org/2015/09/28-crypto-minutes.html. > > > > This mail is a call for consensus to validate that decision. > > > > Anyone objecting to that decision should make his motivated point before > the 20th of October at 17:00 UTC. > > If this decision is endorsed, the algorithms descriptions will be gathered > in a dedicated Note. > > > > Regards, > > Virginie > > Chair of the web crypto WG > > > > //please ignore the following statement > ------------------------------ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. >
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2015 17:32:41 UTC