- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:22:34 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25618 --- Comment #41 from Brian LaMacchia <bal@microsoft.com> --- (In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #39) > > "I want to ship S1 and have the flexibility to add a new hash > > algorithm/elliptic curve/KDF/padding mode/whatever in some scenario quickly > > without needing to reopen S1" > > As an implementation matter, you can just add it, right? If you really need > to do it quickly, you can't wait for the likely-long process of S2 going to > REC. But I need a way to do it without violating S1, which I don't have today. Using my previous example, without extensibility points like Mark was adding I can't add support for "SHA-3" to the RSA-PSS list without violating the S1-specified behavior. The base spec needs to have cryptographic agility built in or I have to break the behavior contract to extend it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 16:22:37 UTC