- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:59:49 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25618 --- Comment #40 from Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> --- (In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #35) > > As a theoretical, or practical matter? > Like I said, algorithm optionality is a whole other story ... But, if we are being practical, would it work to simply maintain a list - in a small spec or on a WebCrypto WG web page - of WebCrypto specifications, which we would point to from the base spec (under the definition of 'other specifications'). This _surely_ solves the practical matter of discoverability, without invoking the presently-rather-heavy W3C specification update process for each new extension. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 15:59:51 UTC