Re: Should we do a call Monday re Last Call?

+1


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote:

>
> On May 15, 2014 1:53 AM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > In good news, the public seems to have noticed the API :) In bad news,
> > we have to resolve all the bugs raised by May 20th over the next few
> > weeks. Ryan's done a tremendous amount of work responding.
> >
> > There's been a few bugs raised that could require a call since there
> > seems to be some disagreement. In particular, there's a few substantial
> > disagreements over the bugs filed by INRIA over oracle attacks, Rich
> > Salz's specifics re "recommendation" (and my and Vijay's proposals to
> > deal with it), and the like. While many of these are repeats of issues
> > we've already discussed at length, it may be useful to revisit in light
> > of public comments.
> >
> > Would people prefer to:
> >
> > 1) Not do a call and keep discussing over mailing list, revisiting the
> > possibility of a telco for consensus after May 20th?
> >
> > 2) Do a call on the 19th to see if we can reach consensus over telco?
> >
> > 3) Not do a call and keep discussing over mailing list, try to do a
> > consensus over alternatives without any call over the mailing list after
> > May 20th?
> >
> >   cheers,
> >       harry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> I vote 3.
>