- From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 06:16:15 -0700
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACvaWva+G3P_z-M-M=Ej+MJOrYOFekE=rSJEJdkiiV4Msq21ww@mail.gmail.com>
On May 15, 2014 1:53 AM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > > In good news, the public seems to have noticed the API :) In bad news, > we have to resolve all the bugs raised by May 20th over the next few > weeks. Ryan's done a tremendous amount of work responding. > > There's been a few bugs raised that could require a call since there > seems to be some disagreement. In particular, there's a few substantial > disagreements over the bugs filed by INRIA over oracle attacks, Rich > Salz's specifics re "recommendation" (and my and Vijay's proposals to > deal with it), and the like. While many of these are repeats of issues > we've already discussed at length, it may be useful to revisit in light > of public comments. > > Would people prefer to: > > 1) Not do a call and keep discussing over mailing list, revisiting the > possibility of a telco for consensus after May 20th? > > 2) Do a call on the 19th to see if we can reach consensus over telco? > > 3) Not do a call and keep discussing over mailing list, try to do a > consensus over alternatives without any call over the mailing list after > May 20th? > > cheers, > harry > > > > > > I vote 3.
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 13:16:42 UTC