- From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:24:38 -0500
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>
- Cc: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL02cgQMK_yf1QxkTc-z=eDaPga1ybaEb6HnUp9McNDS8fM5Jg@mail.gmail.com>
It's pretty far back in my queue. I've looked at it briefly, but every time I try to get started, I run into the wall of useless documentation on testthewebforward.com. It might help to have a consolidated event to get some focused attention, even if it's only for the testing guys to explain how they like their tests done. --Richard On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:47 AM, GALINDO Virginie < Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote: > > Dear implementers, > Any bandwidth on your side to start a consistent test suite, allowing to > demonstrate in the end the interoperability of your implementations in > march 2015 ? > > Harry, > How can W3C help ? > Mandating one person to work directly on test definition, one person to > help implementers to convert their tests, money and office to organizing a > test day ? > > All, > Do we need a dedicated call in January for that ? > > Virginie > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Halpin [mailto:hhalpin@w3.org] > Sent: mardi 16 décembre 2014 12:03 > To: GALINDO Virginie; public-webcrypto@w3.org > Subject: Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] about tests > > > > On 12/16/2014 11:46 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: > > Harry, > > have tracked the references to implementer's test repository here : > https://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/wiki/Main_Page#WG_Testing_activity, > based on additional information shared recently by Eric Roman. > > Netflix few test are supposed to be around here : > > https://github.com/Netflix/NfWebCrypto/tree/master/ > > The wiki-page just links to the precise links that I mention below, > although it's good to have the Google input/out docs. > > Yet, the problem that the implementers test-suites are all still basically > custom and many are limited in coverage so substantial work remains. > > > Virginie > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Harry Halpin [mailto:hhalpin@w3.org] > > Sent: mardi 16 décembre 2014 11:00 > > To: public-webcrypto@w3.org > > Subject: Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] about tests > > > > On 12/16/2014 10:15 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: > >> Harry, > >> During our F2F meeting you mentionned the possibility to get some > supports for the testing aspects. > >> Any news and/or concrete achievement on that side ? > > > > It's quite important from a developer-perspective to make sure they can > know they have interop, so it is important. > > > > I've been looking at the test-suites. Unforunately, it's a large amount > of work due to the uneven and non-portable nature of the tests: > > > > Mozilla[1]: Uses a custom framework. Few tests. No net cost reduction by > porting. > > > > Google[2]: No tests per se, only test data. > > > > Google[3]: C++ code. Again not worth porting. > > > > Apple[4]: Custom JS framework. Very few tests. Hard to port. > > > > So in other words, existing tests seem to require starting from > > scratch > > (difficult) or help from the browser vendors in porting tests and > covering. > > > > Also, are all those links rights? Is there a Netflix implementation or > any others with tests we should be aware of? > > > > Would implementers be willing to help create the unified test suite? > > > > cheers, > > harry > > > > > > [1]: > > http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?tree=mozilla-central&q=p > > ath%3Adom%2Fcrypto%2Ftest&redirect=true > > [2]: > > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/content/tes > > t/data/webcrypto/ > > [3]: > > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/content/chi > > ld/webcrypto/test/ > > [4]: http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/crypto > > > > W3C is working internally on trying > >> Virginie > >> ________________________________ > >> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > >> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > >> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages > caused by a transmitted virus. > >> > > > > ________________________________ > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. > > > ________________________________ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 17:25:07 UTC