Re: EC "raw"

Any feedback on this?

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Richard Barnes <> wrote:

> Couple of questions about the "raw" import format for EC keys.
> 1. Is there a better / more free reference than X9.62 available?  It would
> really be better if every implementor didn't have to purchase a copy from
> 2. The specification currently does not require validation that the
> provided octet string actually represents a point on the curve.  If X9.62
> does such a check (not having a copy, I don't know), then it seems like
> there should be spec language on what to do if the check fails.
> --Richard

Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 04:34:48 UTC