Re: Cancelling meeting today?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 08/25/2014 05:07 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> In the event of the usual thread silence, is an absence of a reply 
> confirmation that it is canceled?
> 
> If not, and to avoid confusion, who is responsible for clearly 
> communicating cancelation?

Usually the chair is responsible to send an agenda 24 hours ahead of
time or cancel, apologies for late notice.

I was on vacation last week without internet access, catching up on
things.

   cheers,
       harry

> On Aug 25, 2014 5:50 AM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> I propose we cancel this meeting but focus heavily on formally
> closing all issues by our next meeting, which is Sept 8th, and then
> formally move to Last Call on Sept 22nd.
> 
> The largest outstanding issue is probably the extensibility issue,
> but Mark seems confident the proposal text is extensible.
> 
> There is still debate re NUMS being included in the main spec or as
> an extension spec, but I haven't heard any updates from anyone on
> that front.
> 
> cheers, harry
>> 
>> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=IBsT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 25 August 2014 15:24:24 UTC