Re: Extensibility reviews?

I made some explicit suggestions as to extensibility points here:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25618#c9

But then the discussion got pulled into the registry thing again. I think
(hope) we've just about resolved that - or at least reduced it to a more
narrow open issue - so we could get back to the concrete discussion of
needed extensibility points.

...Mark


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote:

> I think the idea of nominating "someone" to review is dangerous and not in
> line with the spirit of the W3C review.
>
> We need everyone to review AND file bugs for anything wonky they see. Just
> because we may or may not have a volunteer does not mean they will notice
> everything or things will be timely.
>
> So please, EVERYONE, review and file bugs.
> On Aug 12, 2014 5:57 AM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Although the great debate over whether non-NIST curves should be part
>> of the main spec continues, I think a very practical task that will
>> block us getting out of CR will regardless is the extensibility issue.
>>
>> In particular, we need someone to go over the spec in detail to look
>> for extensibility points *in the text of the main spec*:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25618
>>
>> Any volunteers?
>>
>>   cheers,
>>      harry
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT6g7+AAoJEPgwUoSfMzqcdFsP/iacyEf6sKH8EOiVthvvXL5w
>> HHYUtusS8WEU137T9YD4sPGxOrPt13AE2LCqGezqu3uROr+2y02YsjIqgvd/8bWD
>> kMxwZ5mJoWpz6p7/u/QLN/FkqiVcFLHPFDremPtDxBA3fu2PoISIbakqHrkR4YDb
>> /DyoqdhlXisMXRVhc1fyT8eJx8/1sZCyByfLWSQUoZ1NE8YsSI3BKuZlMfreYjlG
>> wYtswJ0EdQUNieAHSWznpAUBfDL7n0RDp3E1Lt0pruHAQejGqvUTAaOAFewkcXtc
>> BZHMM7GOXzoVkhDpXdiF+9/njybetkf/eeJEpQC/ZNNxEbxwtFwD9PMtVjPgGL3y
>> dVej4y+Cm3nhTzETcnhLRnqX990Tu5hXJwn3UpR74Oz1DO9ZDD7Rsy7qvEYJDAIZ
>> 88gW9DUbphrl6gpOP77esMatbvqWPZRcS5ptjM9xZGqUg2EDbjckQkRwusLRI2IQ
>> 8pF0j5OfySDw176zyUH0HtUARsOkXTuKLtTxxcpC4uyEwmuuSCc0M52bGljWAZ7H
>> BPyfJgVqy4gN0eaTRwO1+IC1HNXGLxH2ZUOzkz5LbZezEVHEtPbNC4gvmDE/CM9t
>> A/fLpLfw/gOp8OwPvXKpDrH6gA2aDCjilwNhNMF5uvexJuv5JIo7Ir6Ut48pJoFd
>> r/yEzCxTN+wsa93R6Rid
>> =LTOl
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 15:04:51 UTC