- From: Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:22:43 +0100
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- CC: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <527B5BE3.9050305@gmail.com>
OK but entering Last Call without a single reference to progressive operations in the spec seems strange to me and can give arguments to detractors. Regards Aymeric Le 06/11/2013 21:37, Ryan Sleevi a écrit : > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com > <mailto:vitteaymeric@gmail.com>> wrote: > > As I mentioned in other posts, the Streams API is evolving fast > right now (there is a new W3C version and a new WHATWG one), and > indeed it's good to have a note in WebCrypto spec so it will > support progressive operations when Streams are stable, as I wrote > too ideally if a createStream method is feasible the spec should > just mention that it supports Streams (notwithstanding next sentence). > > > As noted, specs reflect what is available. Especially was we move into > Last Call, it's not appropriate to contain such references. As we've > discussed before, it's certainly the intent that it's possible, and > if/when Streams become viable, we'll update the spec to reflect that. > > Streams are certainly something we plan to take on after getting the > current version out. But not only is there no need to include an > informative note (since "Future changes in the Web may add additional > APIs" is implicit in EVERY spec), but it would be inappropriate to > reference in-progress/incomplete work. > > Again, to re-iterate, Streams is something we plan to tackle next. > Your interest has been noted. But we can stop worrying about it for > this version, as was previously decided by the WG. > > Cheers > > > reuse crypto operations: I suggested a stop/resume method for > streams which is different from pause/unpause where resume does > restart from a cloned state of the operation that receives stop > and handle it as eof (ie cloning the crypto operation and closing > the current operation) > > Regards > > Aymeric > > Le 05/11/2013 09:27, GALINDO Virginie a écrit : >> >> Dear all, >> >> Please note that the minutes of our previous call are available >> under http://www.w3.org/2013/10/28-crypto-minutes.html >> >> Regards, >> >> Virginie >> >> Gemalto >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the >> addressees and may contain confidential information. Any >> unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is >> prohibited. >> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be >> liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you >> are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it >> and notify the sender. >> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this >> transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for >> damages caused by a transmitted virus > > -- > Peersm :http://www.peersm.com > node-Tor :https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor > GitHub :https://www.github.com/Ayms > > -- Peersm : http://www.peersm.com node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 09:23:41 UTC