Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - PROPOSAL to close action-87 from Ryan Sleevi on 2013-05-21 (public-webcrypto@w3.org from May 2013)

From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:46:31 -0700
To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
Message-ID: <CACvaWvaVB_e4F1-oWx-Bb7fjCmBGhB+SO1btYa-bQSb516V2Jg@mail.gmail.com>

Virginie,

>From a W3C process standpoint, isn't the correct procedure to just close
them? They are not ISSUEs or bugs. Certainly, it was my intent to close
them out as delivered - same as anyone should be able to do for any action
assigned to them.

Cheers,
Ryan
On May 21, 2013 12:08 AM, "GALINDO Virginie" <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,****
>
> Due to the recent editors draft publication, including the description of
> ArrayBuffer, I suggest that action-87 is closed. ****
>
> http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/87**
>
> Regards,****
>
> Virginie****
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2013 07:47:02 UTC