- From: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:16:55 -0400
- To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
+1 to 5649. It's more general, and like 10 more lines of code. On Jul 8, 2013, at 8:28 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote: > JOSE needs 3994. Please proceed to add that one. I’m ambivalent about whether we need to add 5649 or not. > > -- Mike > > From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:44 PM > To: public-webcrypto@w3.org > Subject: Add algorithm for AES Key Wrap ? > > All, > > Now that we have wrap and unwrap operations defined, should we add an algorithm section for AES Key Wrap (RFC3394 and RFC5649) ? > > I'd be happy to draft the section if there is agreement. > > ...Mark >
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 17:17:26 UTC