- From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:10:33 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <076ED1F6CB375B4BB5CAE78736913607041344848DDF@CROEXCFWP04.gemalto.com>
Harry and all, Few things about your proposal : I like your idea (1) to organize a Korea/Japan/China meeting but the only problem is that we will not be able to make any decision during those calls - what would be the value to vote on something with only part of the group. We definitely need to switch to bi-weekly calls - this has been also backed by Ryan. As a conclusion I would prefer that we make a call twice a month, and my proposal is : - Bi weekly calls on Mondays with alternate timing : one @18:00 UTC and another one @ 15:00 UTC. We need to make a decision this week in order to start our call next week. All opinion are welcome to save this logistic problem ! Regards, Virginie gemalto From: Harry Halpin [mailto:hhalpin@w3.org] Sent: lundi 19 novembre 2012 09:50 To: GALINDO Virginie Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org Subject: Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - New timing for our regular calls On 11/15/2012 04:13 PM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: Dear all, We need to define what will be our new timing for our regular calls. Up to now only 6 participants have answered to the poll. This does not give us enough information to make a decision. Could you please participate under http://doodle.com/nnekkq62drchupts ? Thanks in advance. As regards the timing, 16:00 UTC is 8:00 AM EST, which I think will likely mean losing lots of participation on the West Coast, and it seems folks in Korea/Japan in general can't make that time :( So I think we should stay with the current time for today's call, as Zakim requires some notice to change call times. 1) do a once-a-month call with Korea/Japan/China at a different time. 2) do biweekly calls (which in my experience causes confusion) at different times, with one time being more suitable for California and the other for Korea/Japan/China. Any preferences? Regards, Virginie
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 09:10:58 UTC