- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:08:32 +0100
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- CC: public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org
On 2014-11-11 07:55, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > > It is perfectly described as far as what the spec goes, to the same degree at least that none of the implementations support RSA keys that are not multiples of 8 bits, or that some only support keys of certain sizes. > I see, you mean that it is up to each implementer to decide if JWK's SHOULD is to be interpreted as a MUST? Anders > On Nov 10, 2014 7:12 PM, "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com <mailto:anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>> wrote: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg04661.html > > That is, JWK's SHOULD regarding "p", "q", "dp", "dq", "qi" has in WebCrypto been interpreted as a MUST. > This can't be entirely obvious neither for implementers nor users. > > Anders >
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 07:09:03 UTC