- From: Mountie Lee <mountie.lee@mw2.or.kr>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:41:34 +0900
- To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>, "public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org" <public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAE-+aYLiMCkQLp0p6sjgdy1_osrLtQNpTeA+8C4pmPKB-=oobA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi. current WebCrypto Charter ( http://www.w3.org/2011/11/webcryptography-charter.html) describe the secondary features in Scope chapter. I think Client TLS Certificate can be included in "control of TLS session login/logout" I don't think TLS means not just for server cert only. but it means for server only or server and client certs both. regards mountie. On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>wrote: > On 2013-03-17 21:02, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Anders Rundgren > > <anders.rundgren@telia.com> wrote: > >> I don't claim to have full insight in anything but one thing I do know: > client-certificates are usually referred to in the same context as > _secure_key-storage_ but the latter reached a complete standstill more than > a _decade_ ago. > >> > > The problem appears to be usability, which might explain the > > standstill. See, for example, the recent discussion "Client TLS > > Certificates - why not?", > > http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-March/003946.html > : > > > > Can anyone enlighten me why client TLS > > certificates are used so rarely? It used to > > be a hassle in the past, but now at least > > the major browsers offer quite decent client > > cert support, and seeing how most people > > struggle with passwords, I don't see why > > client certs could not be beneficial even > > to "ordinary users". > > > > The threaded view is available at > > http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-March/thread.html > . > > This discussion missed the initial pain-point, how to provision a > certificate. > > By the actually pretty large communities of client-certificate-users out > there, > this has usually been solved by deploying proprietary software since for > example > Windows doesn't have this functionality, which according to my contacts in > Redmond, > is "By Design": "There's no business case for consumer authentication > using PKI". > > Anders > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Mountie Lee PayGate CTO, CISSP Tel : +82 2 2140 2700 E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net ======================================= PayGate Inc. THE STANDARD FOR ONLINE PAYMENT for Korea, Japan, China, and the World
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 06:42:21 UTC