- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:55:30 -0600
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for your prompt response and corrections, Thierry. It's always something, at the last minute! -Lofton At 06:43 PM 9/14/2009 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >Lofton Henderson wrote: >>Thierry, >>There is a bug on the cover page, Overview.html, in ../TR/... The URI >>for the zip file is not a relative URI, but it is an absolute URI >>pointing to the zip file that resides in our working directory: >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-20090915.zip > > >Arrrg ... >that explains why David was not seeing the updated DTD ... > >>That zip file contains neither the recent changes to Overview.html, nor >>to WebCGM21-XCF.html. > >OK > >>I have fetched the zip file that resides at our publication location in >>../TR/.. I have verified that its contents are correct. > >So did I ! > >>So before publication: fix the absolute URI reference to the ZIP file in >>Overview.html: href="WebCGM21-20090915.zip". (And remember to put the >>corrected Overview.html back into the zip file.) > > >Done, I have changed the link in the Overview.html: >the URI is now relative href="WebCGM21-20090915.zip" > >and I have also updated the zip file with this new overview page > >Tyhanks for this good catch. > >Thierry > > >>Thanks, >>-Lofton. >>At 08:34 AM 9/14/2009 -0700, David Cruikshank wrote: >>>I downloaded the zip file again and didn't see the change made in >>>WebCGM21-XCF.html?? >>> >>>thx..Dave >>> >>>On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> >>>wrote: >>> > Thanks Thierry! >>> > >>> > It is nicer to fix it now rather than after CR / before PR, I think. >>> > >>> > -Lofton. >>> > >>> > At 09:50 AM 9/14/2009 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Lofton, >>> >> >>> >> I have added the quote (") at the end of the definition of the >>> >> styleProperties ENTITY. >>> >> see >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#complete-dtd >>> >>> >> >>> >> the partial DTD >>> >> <!ENTITY % styleProperties >>> >> ..... >>> >> >>> >> was OK >>> >> see >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#notation >>> >> >>> >> the external DTD was also OK >>> >> see >>> >> http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.1/webcgm21.dtd >>> >> >>> >> Also have updated the Zip file >>> >> >>> >> Thierry. >>> >> >>> >> Lofton Henderson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Thierry, >>> >>> Dave Cruikshank has found a little glitch, whereby the spec's in-line >>> >>> copy of the XCF DTD differs from the external file copy... >>> >>> ...a single missing double quote (") at the end of the definition >>> of the >>> >>> styleProperties ENTITY. >>> >>> It is probably too late to fix this now? >>> >>> Can we fix it for the post-CR version (the PR version), claiming >>> that it >>> >>> is an editorial error? (After all, Dave says the external file >>> copy of the >>> >>> DTD is correct.) >>> >>> -Lofton. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:30:02 -0700 >>> >>>> Subject: Re: xcf dtd >>> >>>> From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com> >>> >>>> To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> >>> >>>> [...] >>> >>>> 2) there is a missing double quote -"- at the end of the >>> >>>> styleProperties ENTITY in the spec version of the dtd. This is a >>> >>>> problem since now the spec version is invalid. There should be a -"- >>> >>>> after the last IMPLIED an before the close angle bracket. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> sorry for finding this... >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Dave >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Lofton Henderson >>> <lofton@rockynet.com> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> > At 01:37 PM 9/10/2009 -0700, David Cruikshank wrote: >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> Lofton, >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> where can I find the current "good" copy of the xcf DTD for WebCGM >>> >>>> >> 2.1? >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > This is the spec that will publish Tuesday (so don't publicize this >>> >>>> > URI >>> >>>> > yet): >>> >>>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-webcgm21-20090915/ >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > Our redundant checking should have ensured that the in-line DTD in >>> >>>> > Ch.4 is >>> >>>> > the same as the external DTD at the System Identifier, and both >>> should >>> >>>> > have >>> >>>> > no known errors. (So let me know if that is now correct!) >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > -Lofton. >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > > > >
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 16:56:23 UTC