Re: Fwd: Re: xcf dtd

Thanks Thierry!

It is nicer to fix it now rather than after CR / before PR, I think.

-Lofton.

At 09:50 AM 9/14/2009 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote:
>Lofton,
>
>I have added the  quote (") at the end of the definition of the
>styleProperties ENTITY.
>see
>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#complete-dtd
>
>the partial DTD
><!ENTITY % styleProperties
>.....
>
>was OK
>see
>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#notation
>
>the external DTD was also OK
>see
>http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.1/webcgm21.dtd
>
>Also have updated the Zip file
>
>Thierry.
>
>Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>Thierry,
>>Dave Cruikshank has found a little glitch, whereby the spec's in-line 
>>copy of the XCF DTD differs from the external file copy...
>>...a single missing double quote (") at the end of the definition of the 
>>styleProperties ENTITY.
>>It is probably too late to fix this now?
>>Can we fix it for the post-CR version (the PR version), claiming that it 
>>is an editorial error?  (After all, Dave says the external file copy of 
>>the DTD is correct.)
>>-Lofton.
>>
>>>Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:30:02 -0700
>>>Subject: Re: xcf dtd
>>>From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
>>>To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
>>>[...]
>>>2) there is a missing double quote -"- at the end of the
>>>styleProperties ENTITY in the spec version of the dtd.  This is a
>>>problem since now the spec version is invalid.  There should be a -"-
>>>after the last IMPLIED an before the close angle bracket.
>>>
>>>sorry for finding this...
>>>
>>>Dave
>>>
>>>On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> 
>>>wrote:
>>> > At 01:37 PM 9/10/2009 -0700, David Cruikshank wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Lofton,
>>> >>
>>> >> where can I find the current "good" copy of the xcf DTD for WebCGM 2.1?
>>> >
>>> > This is the spec that will publish Tuesday (so don't publicize this URI
>>> > yet):
>>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-webcgm21-20090915/
>>> >
>>> > Our redundant checking should have ensured that the in-line DTD in 
>>> Ch.4 is
>>> > the same as the external DTD at the System Identifier, and both 
>>> should have
>>> > no known errors.  (So let me know if that is now correct!)
>>> >
>>> > -Lofton.
>>> >
>>> >
>

Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 13:55:52 UTC