- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:50:47 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton,
I have added the quote (") at the end of the definition of the
styleProperties ENTITY.
see
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#complete-dtd
the partial DTD
<!ENTITY % styleProperties
.....
was OK
see
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21-XCF.html#notation
the external DTD was also OK
see
http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.1/webcgm21.dtd
Also have updated the Zip file
Thierry.
Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> Dave Cruikshank has found a little glitch, whereby the spec's in-line
> copy of the XCF DTD differs from the external file copy...
>
> ...a single missing double quote (") at the end of the definition of the
> styleProperties ENTITY.
>
> It is probably too late to fix this now?
>
> Can we fix it for the post-CR version (the PR version), claiming that it
> is an editorial error? (After all, Dave says the external file copy of
> the DTD is correct.)
>
> -Lofton.
>
>> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:30:02 -0700
>> Subject: Re: xcf dtd
>> From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
>> To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
>> [...]
>> 2) there is a missing double quote -"- at the end of the
>> styleProperties ENTITY in the spec version of the dtd. This is a
>> problem since now the spec version is invalid. There should be a -"-
>> after the last IMPLIED an before the close angle bracket.
>>
>> sorry for finding this...
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Lofton Henderson
>> <lofton@rockynet.com> wrote:
>> > At 01:37 PM 9/10/2009 -0700, David Cruikshank wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Lofton,
>> >>
>> >> where can I find the current "good" copy of the xcf DTD for WebCGM
>> 2.1?
>> >
>> > This is the spec that will publish Tuesday (so don't publicize this URI
>> > yet):
>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-webcgm21-20090915/
>> >
>> > Our redundant checking should have ensured that the in-line DTD in
>> Ch.4 is
>> > the same as the external DTD at the System Identifier, and both
>> should have
>> > no known errors. (So let me know if that is now correct!)
>> >
>> > -Lofton.
>> >
>> >
>
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 07:51:11 UTC