WG meeting Wednesday

Let's have this brief meeting and see if we can get a resolution to proceed 
to PR after removing some at-risk stuff.

Time:  11am ET, Wed., 11-nov-09

Logistics:
----------
Zakim bridge +1 617-761-6200 (US) or +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France)
code: 932246 ("WEBCGM")
IRC, channel #webcgm
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html

I have heard from everyone except Dieter.  Benoit can't make it.  If Dieter 
doesn't respond ... we may have no one from PTC.  We'll see.

Note:  the at-risk stuff that we anticipated removing is:  ACI Line Type 
Continuation; ACI Edge Type Continuation; and XCF access to transform stuff.

HOWEVER!  Note that the (A&D) industry priority features ACI LETD (and ACI 
HSD) presently do not have two pass.  I don't believe that we anticipated 
abandoning these two (at least, not the LETD).  Furthermore, we 
are  missing 2-pass for setGetIntensity, which was *not* listed at-risk, 
therefore presents some unpleasant possibilities for delay of progression 
(e.g., another Last Call review possibly).

-Lofton.

[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200911/msg00000.html

At 09:10 AM 11/10/2009 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote:

>Lofton,
>
>I am still on medical break, but I could join, if you don't count on me as 
>scribe  ;-)
>
>Thierry.
>
>Henderson wrote:
>>Stuart, Dave, Benoit, Dieter, Don, Thierry --
>>Could I ask that you each please respond, 'yes' or 'no'?  Can you attend 
>>a brief WG meeting this Wednesday in our usual time slot?
>>This apparently fell through the cracks while I was gone:
>>
>>>At 12:14 PM 10/20/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>...[get] a WG resolution on 4th November to exit CR, initiate PR 
>>>>processing, with document as [to be] modified by CR comments and "at 
>>>>risk" removals.  For the latter, we will need a resolution listing the 
>>>>removals.  That in turn will depend on the results of the previous TC 
>>>>meeting with implementors.
>>>>
>>>>If that is done on the 4-nov meeting, then it will be clear when I 
>>>>return, how to make the draft PR text, and more importantly, what to 
>>>>take back to the TC (*that* is the critical time path now; W3C PR can 
>>>>proceed slowly, as OASIS is going to take much more time.)
>>While this meeting would not guarantee that we can initiate the ponderous 
>>OASIS OS process in December, on the other hand if we don't do a 
>>resolution this week, it is fairly certain that we will miss the December 
>>window.
>>In other words, a week lost now costs us a month later.   So this is 
>>pretty important.
>>AFAIK, there has been no further progress on the "at risk" features, so 
>>the removals will be unchanged from 3 weeks ago.  (The ACI items for 
>>"continuation mode" on lines and edges, and the XCF access to transforms.)
>>-Lofton.
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:21:33 UTC