- From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:37:37 -0800
- To: "Galt, Stuart A" <stuart.a.galt@boeing.com>
- Cc: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
I should be able to make.it... Dave On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Galt, Stuart A <stuart.a.galt@boeing.com> wrote: > Lofton, > > I will be in meetings from 0600 till 1130 (pacific time) but should be > able to break away for a short period at the regular time. > > Stuart. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson >> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 3:19 PM >> To: WebCGM WG >> Subject: can you join WG meeting Wednesday? >> >> Stuart, Dave, Benoit, Dieter, Don, Thierry -- >> >> Could I ask that you each please respond, 'yes' or 'no'? Can >> you attend a brief WG meeting this Wednesday in our usual time slot? >> >> This apparently fell through the cracks while I was gone: >> >> >At 12:14 PM 10/20/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: >> >> >> >>...[get] a WG resolution on 4th November to exit CR, initiate PR >> >>processing, with document as [to be] modified by CR >> comments and "at >> >>risk" removals. For the latter, we will need a resolution >> listing the >> >>removals. That in turn will depend on the results of the >> previous TC >> >>meeting with implementors. >> >> >> >>If that is done on the 4-nov meeting, then it will be clear when I >> >>return, how to make the draft PR text, and more >> importantly, what to >> >>take back to the TC (*that* is the critical time path now; >> W3C PR can >> >>proceed slowly, as OASIS is going to take much more time.) >> >> While this meeting would not guarantee that we can initiate >> the ponderous OASIS OS process in December, on the other hand >> if we don't do a resolution this week, it is fairly certain >> that we will miss the December window. >> >> In other words, a week lost now costs us a month later. So >> this is pretty >> important. >> >> AFAIK, there has been no further progress on the "at risk" >> features, so the removals will be unchanged from 3 weeks ago. >> (The ACI items for "continuation mode" on lines and edges, >> and the XCF access to transforms.) >> >> -Lofton. >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 23:38:12 UTC