- From: Galt, Stuart A <stuart.a.galt@boeing.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:33:55 -0800
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, I will be in meetings from 0600 till 1130 (pacific time) but should be able to break away for a short period at the regular time. Stuart. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson > Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 3:19 PM > To: WebCGM WG > Subject: can you join WG meeting Wednesday? > > Stuart, Dave, Benoit, Dieter, Don, Thierry -- > > Could I ask that you each please respond, 'yes' or 'no'? Can > you attend a brief WG meeting this Wednesday in our usual time slot? > > This apparently fell through the cracks while I was gone: > > >At 12:14 PM 10/20/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: > >> > >>...[get] a WG resolution on 4th November to exit CR, initiate PR > >>processing, with document as [to be] modified by CR > comments and "at > >>risk" removals. For the latter, we will need a resolution > listing the > >>removals. That in turn will depend on the results of the > previous TC > >>meeting with implementors. > >> > >>If that is done on the 4-nov meeting, then it will be clear when I > >>return, how to make the draft PR text, and more > importantly, what to > >>take back to the TC (*that* is the critical time path now; > W3C PR can > >>proceed slowly, as OASIS is going to take much more time.) > > While this meeting would not guarantee that we can initiate > the ponderous OASIS OS process in December, on the other hand > if we don't do a resolution this week, it is fairly certain > that we will miss the December window. > > In other words, a week lost now costs us a month later. So > this is pretty > important. > > AFAIK, there has been no further progress on the "at risk" > features, so the removals will be unchanged from 3 weeks ago. > (The ACI items for "continuation mode" on lines and edges, > and the XCF access to transforms.) > > -Lofton. > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 23:34:41 UTC