Re: recent WebCGM 2.1 progression activity

Lofton,

Thanks you for your efforts.
If you need any help to produce the WebCGM 2.1 Implementation Report, 
please let me  know.
Regards,
Thierry.



 Henderson a écrit :
> All --
>
> As you notice, things are pretty quiet in the WG lately -- we got the 
> 2nd LCWD review prepared and launched a couple weeks ago, to close on 
> 02 July.
>
> 2.1 TEST SUITE.
> -----
> Meanwhile, over in the TC, a first *raw* release [1] of the new tests 
> for WebCGM 2.1 has been made.  I characterize it as "raw" because it 
> comprises only the additional tests required for new 2.1 features, and 
> it has not yet been fully integrated with the released 2.0 test suite 
> (comprising 1.0 tests and 2.0 tests).  On the other hand, all of the 
> new 40+ tests have gone through a rigorous development and independent 
> review process, and are approved by the TC for publication.  They are 
> suitable for use by 2.1 implementors.
>
> [1] 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32736/webcgm21ts-mod21.zip 
>
>
> This is a temporary publication, and temporary location.  A permanent 
> location will be available soon, after the initial integration into a 
> full 2.1 Test Suite is finished.
>
> IMPLEMENTATION REPORT.
> -----
> I have also produced a skeleton document and started the process to 
> gather actual data for an initial draft of the WebCGM 2.1 
> Implementation Report.  More specifically, to gather an initial 
> snapshot about the four implementors' statuses on the new tests of the 
> WebCGM 2.1 test suite.
>
> As soon as I have assembled this initial snapshot, this document 
> *will* become a WG document, to be developed and refined here until we 
> exit CR.  (Stay tuned for the initial snapshot, in the near future, as 
> soon as I have gotten initial responses from all the implementors.)
>
> This document should provide a foundation for:  preliminary goals & 
> agenda planning for Ann Arbor; refinement of our anticipated time line 
> to our CR-Exit milestone.
>
> Questions?
>
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 17:50:56 UTC