Re: Wednesday's scheduled WG telecon

Actually I am already back. If you want we can do the telecon now on the 
bridge.

Thierry

Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Thierry -- Instead of the regular telecon, I will await your call 2 
> hours later, 13:00 ET (11:00 MT).
> 
> All -- does anyone have anything they want to discuss in the regular 
> telecon slot, in 20 minutes (at 11:00 ET)?
> 
> -Lofton.
> 
> At 11:06 AM 12/16/2009 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> This afternoon I have an appointment, I may be back for the telecon 
>> but not 100% sure.
>>
>> I suggest that I call you latter today (18:00Z) (2 hours after the 
>> normal telecon slot) if that is doable for you.
>>
>> Or let me know a slot today after 18:00Z that fits you.
>> Also please remind me your tel number.
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>> Thierry -- If you are able to dial in, I think it would be a good 
>>> idea if at least you and I converse during the telecon slot (11am 
>>> ET), just to firm up the PR-advancement plan and make sure we haven't 
>>> overlooked something. Does that sound okay?
>>> All -- you are welcome to join; it is mainly going to be a matter of 
>>> deciding the action items for Thierry and I, with dates, etc.
>>> Logistics
>>> ----------
>>> Zakim bridge +1 617-761-6200 (US) or +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France)
>>> code: 932246 ("WEBCGM")
>>> IRC, channel #webcgm
>>> _http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html
>>> _Answering the rest of your questions, in-line...
>>> At 07:19 PM 12/15/2009 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote:
>>>> Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>>>> All --
>>>>> My bad, we did already resolve to advance:
>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Nov/0010.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, we are all set then. So we need to work on the final PR document
>>> It is all finished except that I need to move your cover page into 
>>> the directory with the rest of the files (../current-editor-21/..)
>>>
>>>> Here is the cover page I had edited.
>>>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/PR/
>>>>
>>>> Please check the removed features.
>>> The "removed features" is correct.
>>>
>>>> Does this conforms to the matrix of implementation.
>>> I have not yet removed the associated tests from the matrix.  (I need 
>>> to do so.)
>>>
>>>> Is tha matrix up to date ? any new testcases passed ?
>>> I updated the matrix last week.  It accurately reflects the current 
>>> status of the implementations, according to the implementors.
>>>
>>>> Are these features removed from the spec ?
>>> Yes, I have already removed them.
>>> -Lofton.
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 16:12:04 UTC