[Minutes] WebCGM Ann Arbor F2F Day 1 (8/24)

WebCGM WG --

The minutes of the Ann Arbor F2F Day 1 (8/24) are at

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/08/24-webcgm-minutes-F2Fd1.html

and also available as text, below.

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                           WebCGM face-to-face
                    Ann Arbor -- 24 Aug 2009 -- Day 1

    [2]Agenda

       [2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/F2F/

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/08/24-webcgm-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Rob, Dave, Lofton, tmichel, bbezaire, don, stuart, ulrich,
           forrest

    Regrets
    Chair
           lofton

    Scribe
           stuart

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]Welcome, Logistics, Week's events, Review agenda
          2. [6]Last Call processing
          3. [7]Begin CR discussions...
          4. [8]test suite review
      * [9]Summary of Action Items
      _________________________________________________________

    <lofton> look at agenda:
    [10]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/F2F/

      [10] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/F2F/

Welcome, Logistics, Week's events, Review agenda

    Welcome all and thank you for PTC hosting this meeting.

Goals for this meeting

      * finalize 2nd LCWD processing
      * schedule CR spec production
      * finalize agreement on CR exit criteria
      * look at implementations and test suites ("test-fest")
      * plan & agree CR/PR schedules
      * (start) prepare CR transition materials
      * If time allows talk about what is next

Last Call processing

    any Last Call loose ends

    We had one comment come in
    [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Aug/001
    3.html

      [11] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Aug/0013.html

    It was agreed that 2.7.2 is the prefered option.

    lofton - do we need to have a informative pointer in 5.4?

    general consesus was no.

    resolution: update 2.7.2 with the proposed wording

    Lofton will update the spec and Thierry will send a note to the

    lofton - Are there any other items that will impact the last call
    working draft.

    nobody could think of any.

    mime questions -- BB/cgz and DC/cgm

    Do we need a special mime type for .cgz files?

    It looks like we will not need a special mime type for the
    compressed files.

    What about links into files?

    <lofton> thierry, thanks for your email about mime. A question Rob
    asked...

    <lofton> it appears that SVG is not in the IANA registry. SVG used
    the "new procedure" of...

    <lofton> reference [$1\47] in my email message -- registry template
    is included

    <lofton> in SVG spec appendix from LCWD to REC, and that should

    <lofton> accomplish the SVG mime type registration. Do you know why

    <lofton> its not in IANA registry yet?

    lofton - maybe we should add some text that by convention .cgm is
    used for uncompressed cgm files and .cgz is used to compressed cgm
    files.

    lofton - a statement warning about changing file extensions might
    break links

    <lofton> yes, we are agreed -- I will replace the .cgz sentence in
    2.4 accordingly

    <Rob> IANA register URL
    [12]http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/image/

      [12] http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/image/

    <tmichel> can you please resent the IANA registration URI, I was
    logged off. Thanks.

    IANA register URL
    [13]http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/image/

      [13] http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/image/

    final production of DoC document

    lofton will make the agreed changes to 2.7.2 and send them out
    around lunch time today

    rob - did we discuss updating the existing IANA registration for
    CGM?

    we will discuss IANA registration until tomorrow morning.

Begin CR discussions...

    CR Draft and Timeline.

    lofton - with the exception of the cover page the CR draft is almost
    ready.

    tmichel - the cover page is ready.

    we need to decide "when to publish" it will be a function of when we
    will have the other stuff prepared.

    it can happen a couple days after a transition call with the
    director.

    It sounds like sometime the week of Sept 8th.

    Then we might be able to publish on the 10th.

    How long should CR be is the next question.

    lofton - it might take until sometime in October to be able to
    resolve the fate of the at risk items.

    we need to define the minimum amount of time that we remain in CR.

    lofton - we should probably have the minimum be four weeks.

    after CR exit the document will need to be updated and there needs
    to be a transition call.

    the driver is the implementations.

    We are not sure what we need for the exit criteria.

    lofton - we have discovered a hole in the test suite and it may put
    some of the features at risk.

    if "should" is used in the implementation report then during the
    transition call we would need to discuss this with the director as
    to why we are different

Breaking for lunch

    We are back from lunch

    <Rob> Suart, Zakim excused himself about 30 minutes ago.

    bummers, I guess I need to reinvite it

    We are dialing in now.

test suite review

    The test matrix was reviewed and various implementations were
    compared.

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]
      _________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.135
     ([15]CVS log)
     $Date: 2009/08/25 13:13:03 $
      _________________________________________________________

      [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

    [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20
Check for newer version at [16]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002
/scribe/

      [16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: stuart
Inferring ScribeNick: stuart
Found Scribe: Dav4e
Found Scribe: Dave
Inferring ScribeNick: Dave
Found Scribe: stuart
Inferring ScribeNick: stuart
Scribes: stuart, Dav4e, Dave
ScribeNicks: stuart, Dave
Default Present: AnnArborF2F, thierry, Dave, Rob
Present: Rob Dave lofton tmichel bbezaire don stuart ulrich forrest
Agenda: [17]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/F2F/
Got date from IRC log name: 24 Aug 2009
Guessing minutes URL: [18]http://www.w3.org/2009/08/24-webcgm-minutes.h
tml
People with action items:

      [17] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/F2F/
      [18] http://www.w3.org/2009/08/24-webcgm-minutes.html

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.

    End of [19]scribe.perl diagnostic output]

      [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:28:22 UTC