re: thin agenda for Wednesday

Thanks for the feedback, Don.

Dave, Stuart, Benoit, Dieter (, Thierry):  for the record, could you also 
send your position (approve/disapprove) and any comments you might 
have?  We will close the issue by email, unless there are objections and 
adverse comments.

All:  meeting adjourned.

Regards,
-Lofton.


At 09:11 AM 4/8/2009 -0500, Don wrote:
>Lofton,
>
>  >  Hi WebCGM WG --
>
>  >  I think, while we are waiting for the TC to finish its action items 
> on the
>  >  Test Suite, that we have a potentially thin agenda again this week.  In
>  >  fact, the single item that I can think of is this:
>
>  >  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Apr/0000.html
>
>  >  We can convene and talk about it and approve it tomorrow.  Or we can
>  >  approve it by email (already vetted in the TC, by the way) and 
> "adjourne"
>  >  again now.  I will then update the current-editor draft with our 
> decision.
>
>  >  Thoughts?
>
>I approve of the recommendation to increase the limit to 64 and
>  see no need for telecon.
>
>  >  For information:  progress is being made on the Test Suite, and there is
>  >  some hope that it will (almost) meet the end-April milestone for first
>  >  reviewed release version.
>
>  >  We're still thinking in terms of a virtual f2f April 27-29.
>
>
>Regards,
>Don
>Larson Software Technology
>Tel: (713)977.4177 ext. 102
>www.cgmlarson.com
>  >  Regards,
>  >  -Lofton.

Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 14:30:53 UTC