- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:48:27 -0600
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20080910172642.03cdd468@rockynet.com>
All -- There is now a complete document here: [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/highlight-test/ What I did: 1.) I marked the new-functionality changes #1 - #8 that are mentioned here: [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/highlight-test/WebCGM21-Appendix.html#webcgm_whatsnew If you jump from one of those links, you'll find it. If you space through most chapters (except #3), you will happen upon the markup. Not done / Todo / questions: 2.) I did not markup anything for #9 in [1], transparency clarifications, because it is not new functionality. 3.) I did not markup anything for #10 in [1], deprecation/obsoletion, for same reason. 4.) I did not go through the change log [2] for more candidates: [2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/highlight-test/WebCGM21-Appendix.html#webcgm_changelog There are probably a couple lurking in there. 5.) I suspect there is some stuff to mark in Ch.3, but on the other hand all I have found so far is some sub-string hotspot stuff (clarification?), and some deprecation/obsoletion stuff in 3.4. QUESTION: ----- Is this good enough? Or could it be good enough with a small amount of work (1/2 day at most)? For those who are willing, we could spend a little time on this at the end of the telecon, and (if not good enough yet), decide on a small number of additional markups. -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2008 23:49:16 UTC