- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:13:51 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, > > Aha, good. I'll give it a try this week. > > We still need to be careful that we represent properly what is marked up > and what is not. We will try to mark up all changes of *substance*, and > try to avoid simple editorial changes. But at some point, that > distinction becomes subjective, and we need to be careful not to imply > "...if it isn't marked, then it isn't different from 2.0". > > I'll continue to develop the markup version in that ../highlight-test/.. > directory. We can then decide at the last minute. OK > > (Question: might it be possible to make the unmarked version be the > authoritative one, and point to a technically identical marked version? > Or is that only done at REC level -- normative version versus other > versions. I'm not recommending it now, just wondering.) My proposal was to remove the styling when entering in CR. We will leave the markup in the HTML <body> page and remove the style sheet in <head> TM.
Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 15:16:00 UTC