- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:26:13 -0500
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1190640373.1816.26.camel@localhost>
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:14 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: > Chris Lilley wrote: > > On Friday, September 21, 2007, 4:42:16 PM, Ian wrote: > > > > IBJ> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 14:35 +0000, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > >>>> I could not find anywhere in our W3C process or guidelines, mentioning > >>>> this "non-normative" on the errata page. > > > > IBJ> Just to follow up on this point, in our Manual of style [1], > > IBJ> see the section on "entries on an errata page". > > > > And the process document says: > > > > 7.6.1 Errata Management > > > > A correction is first "proposed" by the Working Group. A correction > > becomes normative -- of equal status as the text in the published > > Recommendation -- through one of the processes described below. An > > errata page MAY include both proposed and normative corrections. The > > Working Group MUST clearly identify which corrections are proposed > > and which are normative. > > http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#errata > > > Yes I read that in the process document. But it is largelly not done by WGs. Right, this is unfortunate and I hope that by talking with people at a Chairs meeting we can spread better practice. > > > > This is why the SVG 1.1 errata have "proposed" and "draft" errata but > > no "normative" errata. > > http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata > > Does that mean "proposed" are resolved by the WG and "draft" errata are > not ? > > Why don't you have "normative" ? The Wg has chosen not to go through the > process of making them normative ? Correct. "Normative" in this context means "Has gone through a W3C Process." The rest of the text has been subject to review and a decision by the Director; the goal is for the changes that fix errata to be through a similar process (though shorter). _ Ian > > We usually have the WG resolved errata on the public page and we track > errata on anothet Group page. Once the Group errata page are resolved, > they are moved to the public page. > > > > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Monday, 24 September 2007 13:26:26 UTC