- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:02:04 +0200
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
On Friday, September 21, 2007, 4:42:16 PM, Ian wrote: IBJ> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 14:35 +0000, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: >> > >> > I could not find anywhere in our W3C process or guidelines, mentioning >> > this "non-normative" on the errata page. IBJ> Just to follow up on this point, in our Manual of style [1], IBJ> see the section on "entries on an errata page". And the process document says: 7.6.1 Errata Management A correction is first "proposed" by the Working Group. A correction becomes normative -- of equal status as the text in the published Recommendation -- through one of the processes described below. An errata page MAY include both proposed and normative corrections. The Working Group MUST clearly identify which corrections are proposed and which are normative. http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#errata This is why the SVG 1.1 errata have "proposed" and "draft" errata but no "normative" errata. http://www.w3.org/2003/01/REC-SVG11-20030114-errata -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 24 September 2007 12:02:15 UTC