Re: WG assignments -- WebCGM 1.0 Errata review

Lofton Henderson wrote:
> 
> At 10:51 AM 9/11/2007 -0700, Cruikshank, David W wrote:
> 
>> Comments on E06
>> The links to 3.1.2.4 and 3.2.1.1 in the para under "Overview" are
>> broken.
> 
> Thanks for catching those.  I ran W3C link checker and found three more, 
> 2 of which were in E01 and I fixed 'em.
> 
> Thierry, the one remaining broken link is in the header, "This version", 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/WebCGM10-errata.html .  That is where this 
> document will go after draft review, correct?  Do we need to do anything 
> about that link until then?
> 

That is fine. the broken link will be resolved once we publish the 
document at final URI.

Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 07:14:00 UTC