- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:10:01 -0600
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Thierry (et al) -- At 09:20 AM 10/5/2007 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >[...] >Thanks for adding the proper wording in the "Status of the errata" section >and 6th bullet. > >For WebCGM10 errata: >If you agree, I should publish >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html > >at >http://www.w3.org/2007/WebCGM10-errata.html > >No need to wait for public review, they have WG approval. I agree, we can publish the 1.0 errata now if you (and everyone) are happy with the added status notation. >And, as resolved we will not publish a WebCGM10 third version (Chris also >agreed to it). Right. >For WebCGM20 errata: >Once we have a full resolution on all erratum >E02, E03, E04, E05, E06, E07 have pending 'TBD" "WG-approved Resolution:" >at >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-errata-draft.html > > >we will publish in proper public space. Yes, we will settle the "WG-approved Resolution" at the 11th October telecon, after which we can update the document and publish. Thanks, -Lofton. > Henderson wrote: >>In an earlier thread, Thierry wrote about a proposed "status" addition to >>the errata documents... >>At 05:29 PM 9/21/2007 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >>>"These corrections are proposed by the WebCGM Working Group, which has >>>consensus that they are appropriate; they are not to be considered >>>normative until approved by a Call for Review of Proposed Corrections or >>>a Call for Review of an Edited Recommendation" >>Ian Jacobs confirmed that it was right and appropriate to have this in >>the errata documents. I have updated our two draft internal errata >>documents accordingly: >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-errata-draft.html >> >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html >> >>See the new header section "Status of the errata", and see the new 6th >>bullet in the bullet list at the start of the header section. >>Comments welcome. >>-Lofton. >> > > > >
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 14:10:28 UTC