- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:20:13 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, Thanks for adding the proper wording in the "Status of the errata" section and 6th bullet. For WebCGM10 errata: If you agree, I should publish http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html at http://www.w3.org/2007/WebCGM10-errata.html No need to wait for public review, they have WG approval. And, as resolved we will not publish a WebCGM10 third version (Chris also agreed to it). For WebCGM20 errata: Once we have a full resolution on all erratum E02, E03, E04, E05, E06, E07 have pending 'TBD" "WG-approved Resolution:" at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-errata-draft.html we will publish in proper public space. Best, Thierry. Henderson wrote: > > In an earlier thread, Thierry wrote about a proposed "status" addition > to the errata documents... > > At 05:29 PM 9/21/2007 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >> "These corrections are proposed by the WebCGM Working Group, which has >> consensus that they are appropriate; they are not to be considered >> normative until approved by a Call for Review of Proposed Corrections >> or a Call for Review of an Edited Recommendation" > > Ian Jacobs confirmed that it was right and appropriate to have this in > the errata documents. I have updated our two draft internal errata > documents accordingly: > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-errata-draft.html > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html > > > See the new header section "Status of the errata", and see the new 6th > bullet in the bullet list at the start of the header section. > > Comments welcome. > > -Lofton. > > >
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 07:20:36 UTC