- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:53:14 -0600
- To: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
We will proceed with option a.). Stay tuned for "Poll" message and please respond promptly, to list. -Lofton. At 01:00 PM 5/24/2007 -0400, Weidenbrueck, Dieter wrote: >I agree with Benoit, a) would be best. > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von > > Bezaire, Benoit > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 18:50 > > An: WebCGM WG > > Betreff: RE: WG telecon non-participation > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > My intent was to participate in the call, but additional > > (important) work related telecons showed up in my schedule > > today. That's why you didn't see any regrets from me, sorry. > > > > Option a) is easier for me. > > > > Kind regards, > > Benoit. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson > > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:36 AM > > To: WebCGM WG > > Subject: WG telecon non-participation > > > > > > Don, Benoit, Thierry, Dieter, Chris -- > > > > You are listed as members in good standing: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=39256 > > > > Three showed up for telecon, 5 did not, 0 regrets. (I know > > about Chris, and Dieter indicated several weeks ago that he > > might have a recurring Thursday problem.) > > > > Therefore we could not endorse the extension request as > > planned. We have done it in a loose fashion by email, but > > that probably doesn't suffice. What should we do now? > > > > a.) email straw poll (I could summarize w/ URI's of replies) > > b.) telecon 1 week from today (5/31) > > c.) quit > > > > In next email, I will propose a revised draft extension > > request, which I hope will remove any of the possible > > pitfalls that Chris warned about earlier. > > > > -Lofton. > > > >
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2007 16:53:27 UTC