- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:12:40 -0700
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
At 09:40 AM 1/17/2007 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote: >Lofton Henderson wrote: >>At 07:44 PM 1/16/2007 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote: >>>Lofton, >>> >>>I am organizing the request for WebCGM 2.0 Transition to REC. >>> >>>During our next telecon on thursday, we must record the decision to >>>request the Transition to REC: >>> >>>Therefore could you ask the WebCGM Group >>>"Are we ready to go to REC with this document" ? >>>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/Group/2006/REC-webcgm20-20070115/ >>Yes, we can make a resolution in the next telecon. As I recall, that is >>to be Thursday, day after tomorrow. It is possible that it will be >>uploaded by then, but not certain. >>If necessary, can we enumerate the 2-3 changes yet to to be incorporated >>and make a "provisional" resolution? Or must all of it be done and >>frozen by Thursday AM? > >It would certainly be better to have the document finalized by our next >telecon. People could agree on it. If all details of the text is not finished by the end of today, what would you suggest then: 1.) either postpone the telecon till 1/25? 2.) or, approve what is done, conditional upon the application of any further needed changes (like the URI of the OS spec, which is still not available.)? >Also I need to send an URI of the REC document for the transition Request >Call [1] (here again a finalized document would be appreciated. > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=rec-tr I had not realized that a transition telecon with the Director was required. -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 14:13:01 UTC