- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:05:16 -0700
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>,"Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: "Cruikshank, David W" <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>, Janet Daly <janet@w3.org>,W3C Comm Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
At 01:23 PM 1/5/2007 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote: >>Hi Lofton, >>Although it is not strictly required that we sync up the publication >>and the press release, it is strongly preferred. I have a record >>of Thierry Michel indicating (on 17 Nov) that the WG agreed to >>do the publication of the Recommendation at the same time as the >>press release (in January 2007). Our current plan, based on other >>work at W3C, is to issue the Recommendation and press release on 30 >>January. >>> WebCGM 2.0 should be able to move to REC status as soon as we know >>>that OS status is assured (which we now know, and which will be >>>formally declared on/around 2nd January). >>I do not believe we are prepared to issue the Recommendation that >>quickly. We should aim for 30 January 2007. >>I hope that helps, >> _ Ian > > > >Ian, > > >We had previously targeted publication for Jan 15th 2007. Thierry is right. However ... once again ... the date itself is critical information to the ASD/S1000D constituents (and other coordinating groups). Therefore, we (Dave and I) decided not to fight the extra 2-week delay. What is most important now is to tell ASD/S1000D the date, and stick with it. (The exact date is not as critical, as long as it's in January -- correct me if I'm wrong about that, Dave.) >I am not opposed to your new publication date proposal for 30 January >2007, but I will be away at a SYMM WG meeting at that time and will not be >available for it. Could we arrange to have another staff member cover your role, in your absence? (Actually, I expect all documents to be verified and everything to be ready by mid-January, so it should be simple.) -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 14:05:39 UTC