- From: Cruikshank, David W <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:05:09 -0800
- To: <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
The STOD already has this paragraph: "This specification is based, in large part, on a work by the same name, WebCGM 2.0 an OASIS Committee Specification submitted to W3C as WebCGM 2.0 Submission. This Member Submission is related to the previous W3C work on WebCGM 1.0, and draws on experiences with that format from implementors and users over five years. This Working Draft incorporates feedback and discussion following the Submission." Actually that looks like is needs to be cleaned up a little too, e.g., "Working Draft"?? Anyway, to handle the status of WebCGM 1.0, I would propose a paragraph added like the following: "WebCGM 1.0 functionality is mostly a subset of WebCGM 2.0 functionality, with a few exceptions (e.g., feature deprecation) as described in this WebCGM 2.0 text. While WebCGM 1.0 remains a valid specification, primarily to support existing data, use of WebCGM 2.0 viewers and authoring tools is encouraged." Is there more that needs to be said than that?? Thx...Dave Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 22:05:35 UTC