- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:11:07 -0700
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>,WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Thierry, At 07:30 PM 8/27/2007 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >Lofton, > >If my understanding is correct > >All errata have been resolved and "WebCGM TC endorsed on 2007-08-24" >(and are likely to be approuved by theWebCGM WG ;-) > > >except, following which are rejected: >- E09: drawing model descriptions of 1.0 & 2.0 Yes, rejected as being unnecessary. >- E10: deviations of WebCGM 1.0 Model Profile from normative ISO CGM standard Rejected for now because necessary details have not been supplied (by me). It is a complicated and messy one, and needs some careful review of historical stuff. Most likely it will not in fact result in any *substantive* errata, in which case we will ignore it. I am going to try to do the historical review in the next couple of days. Regards, -Lofton. > Henderson wrote: >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html >> >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 17:11:17 UTC