- From: Dieter Weidenbrueck <dieter@itedo.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:42:37 +0200
- To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Hi Lofton, I second your opinion/concerns. However, I will take Thu+Fri off this, so I won't be available for a call. In general I don't feel that there is enough momentum in the group right now, otherwise they would respond. Regards, Dieter > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von > Lofton Henderson > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 20:37 > An: WebCGM WG > Betreff: telecon Thursday? > > > Hi, > > How do people feel about a Thursday AM telecon? > > Continuing the recent trend, it has been quiet on email, and > there isn't much active business. Pending business includes... > > Errata: > ----- > The OASIS 15 day ballot is in progress. Chris has been asked > to move the W3C errata file to replace the dummy that is > currently referenced from the Rec WebCGM 2.0 Status section. > > Future: > ----- > The ball is in CGMO-OASIS WebCGM TC court still. There will > not likely be a late May meeting of the TC. But it is > searching for a summer meeting date. There is interest in > further work, but requirements need to be firmed, scope > decided, and technical work launched. > > Long story short ... if the TC (where most of the energy and > all of the funding resides) decide NOT to proceed, then the > WG likely won't have a future beyond finishing any errata > work. If the TC proceeds, then the WG might have a useful > future, along the lines of the 2.0 collaboration. > > Regards, > -Lofton. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 17:42:30 UTC