- From: Cruikshank, David W <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:37:06 -0700
- To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
I think maybe the key is "all members" waive rights through their AC reps. I've already instructed ours to do that. Thx...Dave Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com -----Original Message----- From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 9:44 AM To: Thierry MICHEL; WebCGM WG Subject: Re: Call for Exclusion: WebCGM 2.0 remains in CR until 22 November 2006. I wonder, why wasn't this potential problem noticed during the 5th September transition teleconference, that approved the 6th October CR exit date? Ian was on that teleconference, and he is the one who issued the call for exclusion. Where does the 60-day requirement come from? As I looked at the various PP documents, I saw several references to "after publication of Last Call working draft". I can't find anything about "60 days before PR transition" or "...after CR transition". (But then again, that just may be my own inability to unravel the Byzantine and intertwined requirements of Process, Patent Policy, How to Organize..., etc.) Is this normal for every technical report, at this stage? If so, then effectively there is no possibility that there can ever be a CR shorter than 60 days. So moving on to practical solutions... Boeing (Dave) Itedo (Dieter) ArborText (Larson) OASIS (Lofton) ...is it possible to get your AC reps to do as Thierry says (below)? (Thierry, why "any right to future exclusions"? Ian's mail says, "If you do not wish to exclude patent claims during this exclusion opportunity, no further action is required." So why can't the AC reps say, "we do not wish to exclude patent claims during this exclusion opportunity"? Saying that would be the logical equivalent of them doing nothing for two months.) -Lofton. At 05:42 PM 9/25/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >With this Call for Exclusion [1], we can't move WebCGM 2.0 to PR before >November 22nd 2006. > >Nevertheless, there is one possibility to enter PR earlier: > > *all* AC Reps of this WG need to agree to waive any right to future > exclusions with respect to the text of the WebCGM CR version. > > >If WG members are OK to do so in a fair amount of time, then we can >gain some time, else we will sit in CR until November 22nd. > >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0067.html >-- >Thierry Michel >W3C > > >
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 17:37:46 UTC