- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:19:20 -0600
- To: public-cdf@w3.org
- Cc: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
Hello CDF WG We wonder if you have had any thoughts about this question, that you can share with us graphics people? Best, -Lofton. At 03:54 PM 7/20/2006 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: >Hello public-cdf, > >Looking at "Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0" (LCWD of Dec. >2005), the WebCGM WG found the section [1] on linking and child documents >to contain particularly interesting and valuable informative material. > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#link-activation-child-documents > >We noticed, in the current editors draft [2] (June 2006), that this >material is missing. (In fact, sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 are missing.) > >[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/cdf.xhtml > >We are wondering if this is an intentional removal, or rather whether >maybe this is just a transient development stage of the document that >we're seeing? > >(Not speaking for SVG ... but as a participant of the SVG WG, I would >voice the same opinion -- valuable material -- because these link-target >details have progressed alternately and together in the two >specifications, WebCGM and SVG.) > >Best Regards, >Lofton Henderson >(Chair WebCGM WG) > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 22:19:43 UTC