Re: link activation material in CDR

Hello CDF WG

We wonder if you have had any thoughts about this question, that you can 
share with us graphics people?

Best,
-Lofton.

At 03:54 PM 7/20/2006 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>Hello public-cdf,
>
>Looking at "Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0" (LCWD of Dec. 
>2005), the WebCGM WG found the section [1] on linking and child documents 
>to contain particularly interesting and valuable informative material.
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#link-activation-child-documents
>
>We noticed, in the current editors draft [2] (June 2006), that this 
>material is missing.  (In fact, sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 are missing.)
>
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/cdf.xhtml
>
>We are wondering if this is an intentional removal, or rather whether 
>maybe this is just a transient development stage of the document that 
>we're seeing?
>
>(Not speaking for SVG ... but as a participant of the SVG WG, I would 
>voice the same opinion -- valuable material -- because these link-target 
>details have progressed alternately and together in the two 
>specifications, WebCGM and SVG.)
>
>Best Regards,
>Lofton Henderson
>(Chair WebCGM WG)
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 22:19:43 UTC