- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:06:38 -0600
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>,Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org,Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, Kentarou Fukuda <KENTAROU@jp.ibm.com>
At 01:25 PM 9/11/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >Chris Lilley wrote: > >>LH> If you start at our preliminary Implementation Report [1], you will find >>LH> your way to a page of viewer implementation information [2]. >>It would be helpful if WebCGM *2* viewers were specifically noted. Yes, that's a good point. I'll note, however, that much of what will be interesting to WAI can be seen in 1.0 -- the structuring elements (APS) are in 1.0, as are most APS attributes (only 'visibility' and 'interactivity' attributes have been added by 2.0). With the right WebCGM samples, WAI could understand typical structuring and navigation using 1.0. WebCGM DOM is missing, of course, as is XCF (XML Companion File) support. I mention this because, as far as I know, the release versions of the products found at [2] do not include the new 2.0 functionality. That is usually found in the Beta and pre-release versions. Different vendors have different policies about disseminating Beta versions. All have agreed to make them within the WG and its staff, for CR verification. I will pursue an item to clarify with the vendors whether they are okay to disseminate a little more widely, and will gather details if so. >Right. If this is not possible on OASIS site, we could list these WebCGM >*2* viewers on the WebCGM W3C page. Depending on the vendor policy about pre-release software, we may have to circulate the information to list-of-individuals, rather than posting publicly. I will pursue answers. -Lofton. >>LH> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/implementation-report.html >>LH> [2] http://www.cgmopen.org/webcgm/viewers.html >> > > >-- >Thierry Michel >W3C > > >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 14:07:46 UTC