- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:18:43 +0200
- To: "Cruikshank, David W" <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
- Cc: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
On Monday, October 2, 2006, 7:22:37 PM, David wrote: CDW> But the OASIS requirement for when we return is that the log reflect CDW> changes since we transitioned to W3C. Do we then have to maintain two CDW> versions of the log? I wasn't considering that aspect when I responded, just the W3C aspect. Its fine to keep a longer list of changes, as long as there is a clearly labelled section that lists the changes since entering CR (even if there are zero changes). CDW> Dave CDW> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange CDW> Boeing Commercial Airplane CDW> 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 CDW> david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com CDW> -----Original Message----- CDW> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] CDW> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:21 AM CDW> To: Lofton Henderson CDW> Cc: WebCGM WG CDW> Subject: Re: WebCGM 2.0 PR version is available CDW> On Monday, October 2, 2006, 6:36:26 PM, Lofton wrote: LH>> 2.) Does this seem like a good time to get rid of D.4 [1]? Does LH>> anyone think we should keep that part of the Change Log? Deleting LH>> D.4 would mean that the Change Log would then start at OASIS 1st CS CDW> / W3C Submission. CDW> The change log should list changes since the last document transition CDW> (ie, in this case, since *entering CR*). CDW> That makes it really short. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 22:19:04 UTC